URoomSurf is a web-based application that allows incoming college students to search for roommates. Instead of marketing their services to institutions, however, URoomSurf went straight to the students. They advertise their service on Facebook by creating groups for specific graduation years at an institution. Students join them, and URoomSurf will use this connection to draw the student to their roommate-matching website. The service is free; URoomSurf says they’ll make money with ads and, perhaps future premium services.
Some college and university administrators are annoyed by what they see as an end-run around the institutions that actually offer the rooms that roommates will share. URoomSurf’s pedigree isn’t helping the situation much. URoomSurf’s promoter, Justin Gaither, was involved in College Prowler, a similar service that also used Facebook as a marketing tool. In that case, College Prowler didn’t advise visitors to its Facebook page that they were not affiliated with any college or university, created “official” institution groups, and used official university logos, leading many students to believe that they were representing or working with their school. Brad Ward, now CEO of the higher education marketing company BlueFuego, pointed out this deception in late 2008. At the time, Ward was with Butler University’s admissions office.
Ward pointed out what he calls FacebookGate2010 on his blog, and the debate commenced. URoomSurf isn’t trampling copyright laws the way they did last time; their pages now note their non-affiliation with any institution, though obliquely. However, some administrators are also annoyed that URoomSurf posted notices on their college’s official Facebook page, even after the institution asked them to cease. Of course, institutions fear that students, having found a “match” through URoomSurf will be dismayed when that match doesn’t happen in real life, either because of logistical issues, or because their institution has its own matching system. They think the service will establish false expectations, and that URoomSurf’s founders were unprofessional not to approach institutions with their idea and seek their partnerships. Several administrators quoted in the Inside HigherEd article make a point of saying URoomSurf’s product is a good idea, but the marketing of it and their adversarial stance toward institutions is off-putting. URoomSurf and its critics defend their points of view in this lengthy (and, um, circular) comment thread on Ward’s blog.
Have you dealt with URoomSurf or College Prowler? Do you have war stories or advice for your colleagues?