Conversations Concluded: H1N1
Friday, November 6th, 2009
Editor’s Note: In the November+December 2009 issue of the Talking Stick we asked members to discuss how they are addressing H1N1 on their campus. As you would expect, they had plenty to say on the subject; so much that their ideas overflowed the magazine pages and onto this blog. So much that we’re even breaking it into three separate posts (read part 1 here and part 2 here). Participating in the Conversation is Mike Krenz, assistant manager for risk management at Texas A & M University in College Station; Gary McLaughlin, business manager for housing at Flinders University of South Australia in Adelaide; Steve Palmer, director of residence life at Western Michigan University in Kalamazoo; Robert Tattershall, director of housing and conference services at Washington State University in Pullman; Dima Utgoff , director of residence services at the University of Alberta in Edmonton, Canada; Joe Gonzalez, associate dean of residential life at Duke University in Durham, North Carolina; Sean Duggan, managing director of university student housing at Texas Tech University in Lubbock; and Bes Liebenberg, coordinator for student support residences at the University of Pretoria in Gauteng, South Africa.
Question: Under what circumstances, if any, would you not isolate students that have H1N1 or are suspected of having H1N1?
Tattershal: We chose self-isolation this time, so in this wave of H1N1 we chose not to isolate. Some time ago, during SARS and H5N1, helping the university understand that true isolation was virtually impossible in a high occupancy residence hall system (over 80 percent of our residents live with a roommate and have to leave their rooms to go to the bathroom and most have to leave at some time to get food), made quite a bit of difference in the current H1N1 discussion. We were successful in getting the committee to think not only of the first few cases of H1N1, so as not to tailor our response just for the beginning of the epidemic on our campus, but for the epidemic after a few weeks, when the numbers would be much larger and overwhelm any attempt to isolate people in the handful of empty spaces we had.
In our situation, we had one case during sorority recruitment, the week before school started. That one case, because of her contact with other students, and their contact with many more, became hundreds of suspected cases of influenza-like illness before we could have implemented an isolation program. Our health professionals stopped testing after the first few cases of H1N1 because of the time lag and cost, and the CDC statements that 98 percent of all influenza A illnesses were H1N1 at this time, which meant that we only knew people were sick, and it was probably H1N1. Therefore, isolation for us would have meant isolating hundreds of residents that had influenza-like illness, and doing so within days of the initial awareness that an outbreak was already here.
We knew last spring, that unless H1N1 mutated very quickly, and became much more lethal and the symptoms were much more severe, our response to H1N1 would be very different compared to what we were planning to do if SARS or H5N1 ever made it within 100 miles of our campus; i.e., recommending to our leadership to close the university. Interestingly, of course, closing the university doesn’t necessarily mean that we could close the halls, as several hundred of our residents simply wouldn’t be able to go home in the face of a infectious disease with high virulence and mortality.
McLaughlin: We did not specifically isolate any residents because by the time a resident was diagnosed they would have infected close contacts (if they were to be infected)anyway. In addition we do not have shared rooms so each resident was in their own room and that made it much easier to keep them away from others. By using the common area specifically set up plus having meals delivered, the infected residents were isolated but were not forbidden going to other areas of the complex.
Duggan: We suggest that students go home if that is an option, or self isolate to their res hall room.
Liebenberg: Only if the diagnoses are not confirmed. Out of a possible 8,000 residents we had only 12 confirmed cases reported and they all went home. I’m convinced that a severe outbreak would necessitate alternative measures. (more…)


